Conclusion
The coming years
will see the publication of many reports evaluating the
impact of the new welfare regime. Some of the most
significant have been described in this publication. If
all goes well, these studies will help policymakers
assess the potential consequences of various reform
efforts. They also will aid practitioners by identifying
implementation challenges and strategies encountered by
others implementing similar reform efforts. In fact,
because the new welfare reform law gives states
unprecedented flexibility in shaping their welfare
programs, these various evaluations may constitute, in
their totality, the best information on the effects of
welfare reform.
These studies will
rely on a variety of evaluation designs and they will
inevitably vary in their quality and usefulness. There
are no perfect evaluations and even poorly executed ones
usually contain some findings that are worthwhile. The
challenge will be to identify what is useful and apply it
to improving programs. These judgments will often require
expertise and experience.
To help the public,
other scholars, practitioners, and policymakers
understand this research and apply its lessons, we have
established a blue ribbon committee of experts in
evaluation and related social science fields to provide
an independent review of the research on welfare reform;
that is, to "evaluate the evaluations."
Each year, the
Committee to Review Welfare Reform Research will assess
the quality and relevance of the 10 to 25 most
significant evaluation studies, identifying those
findings that are sufficiently well-grounded to be
regarded as credible. It will report its findings in the
general media as well as in scholarly and professional
journals.
The professional
stature of the Review Committee's members is obviously
critical to the credibility of its assessmentsand
to the attention they would receive. Thus, it is composed
of experts whose accomplishments in the field of program
evaluation and social policy analysis are widely known
and respected. At present, the members of the committee
are:
Douglas J.
Besharov is a resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research and a
professor at the University of Maryland School of Public
Affairs. He was the first director of the U.S. National
Center on Child Abuse and Neglect. He is the author or
editor of several books, including Recognizing Child
Abuse: A Guide for the Concerned (1990), When
Drug Addicts Have Children: Reorienting Child Welfare's
Response (1994), and Enhancing Early Childhood
Programs: Burdens and Opportunities (1996).
Robert F.
Boruch is University Trustee Chair Professor of
Education and Statistics at the University of
Pennsylvania. A fellow of the American Statistical
Association, he has received awards for his work on
research methods and policy from the American Educational
Research Association, the American Evaluation
Association, and the Policy Studies Association. He is
the author of nearly 150 scholarly papers and author or
editor of a dozen books, including Randomized
Experiments for Planning and Evaluation: A Practical
Guide (1997) and Evaluation of AIDS Prevention
Programs (1991).
James J.
Heckman is Henry Schultz Distinguished Service
Professor of Economics and director of the Center for
Social Program Evaluation at the Harris School of Public
Policy Studies, University of Chicago. He is co-editor of
Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data (1985)
and numerous scholarly articles on evaluation topics.
Robinson G.
Hollister is a professor of economics at
Swarth-more College. He has organized and led reviews of
the effectiveness of employment and training programs,
including The Minority Female Single Parent
Demonstration: New Evidence About Effective Training
Strategies (1990), and was co-editor of The
National Supported Work Demonstration (1984).
Christopher
Jencks is a professor of public policy at the
Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy, Harvard
University. His research areas of interest include social
mobility and inequality. He has been a fellow of the
American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the National
Academy of Social Insurance. His publications include The
Homeless (1994), Rethinking Social Policy: Race,
Poverty, and the Underclass (1992), and
Inequality (1974).
Glenn C.
Loury is a professor of economics and director
of the Institute on Race and Social Division at Boston
University. He has served on several advisory commissions
of the National Academy of Sciences and is currently vice
president of the American Economic Association. He is
author of One by One, From the Inside Out: Essays and
Reviews on Race and Responsibility in America (1995).
Peter H.
Rossi is S.A. Rice Professor Emeritus at the
University of Massachusetts (Amherst). He is a past
president of the American Sociological Association and
has received awards for work in evaluation from the
American Evaluation Association, the American
Sociological Association, and the Policy Studies
Organization. He has authored or co-authored numerous
publications, including Just Punishments: Federal
Guidelines and Public Views Compared (1997),
Feeding the Poor: An Analysis of Five Federal Nutrition
Programs (1997), Evaluation: A Systematic
Approach (1993), and Down and Out in America:
The Origins of Homelessness (1989).
Isabel V.
Sawhill is a senior fellow and holds the Adeline
M. and Alfred I. Johnson Chair in Urban and Metropolitan
Policy at the Brookings Institution. She served two years
as associate director of human resources at the Office of
Management and Budget. She is the author or editor of
numerous books and articles, including Welfare
Reform: An Analysis of the Issues (1995) and
Challenge to Leadership: Economic and Social Issues for
the Next Decade (1988).
Thomas C.
Schelling is Distinguished Professor at the
School of Public Affairs and Department of Economics of
the University of Maryland. He is a past president of the
American Economic Association. He serves on or chairs
committees of the National Academy of Sciences, the
Institute of Medicine, and the Social Sciences Research
Council. He is the author of eight books and over 120
articles, including Choice and Consequence (1984)
and Strategy of Conflict (1980).
James Q.
Wilson is James Collins Professor of Management
at the University of California at Los Angeles and a past
president of the American Political Science Association.
He is the author of numerous books, including Crime
and Human Nature (1996), The Moral Sense (1993),
and Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and
Why They Do It (1991).
Other experts may be
added in the future.
For policymakers and
program administrators to benefit from the Committee's
work, they must be aware of it. Therefore, an extensive
dissemination effort will be undertaken through the
University of Maryland's Welfare Reform Academy. (See Appendix
B.) The
Review Committee's assessments will be designed to be
understandable by program administrators, policymakers,
and the general public, while still being informative to
scholars involved in researching welfare reform. They
will be published in monographs and used as the basis of
articles for scholarly journals, professional journals,
magazines, and newspapers. In addition, we plan to hold
quarterly seminars to review the assessments and place
them in a policy-relevant context. These sessions will be
broadcast on a nationwide TV satellite/downlink network
operated by the Welfare Reform Academy.
� 1997 by the University of Maryland,
College Park, Maryland. All rights reserved. No part
of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner
whatsoever without permission in writing from the University of
Maryland except in cases of brief quotations embodied in news
articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views
expressed in the publications of the University of Maryland are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of
the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trusties of the
University of Maryland
Back to top