Appendix B
The Welfare
Reform Academy
In 1997, the School
of Public Affairs at the University of Maryland created
an academy to help state and local officials, private
social service providers, and other interested parties
take full advantage of the new welfare reform law. While
the law pressures public officials and service providers
to make their programs more efficient and better
targeted, it also presents an unprecedented opportunity
for states to reshape and improve their programs.
The Welfare Reform
Academy will provide training in program design,
implementation, and evaluation for the Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Food Stamp,
Medicaid, job training, child care, child welfare, and
child support programs. Instruction will cover the
following topics:
- understanding
the new welfare reform/block grant environment;
- estimating the
costs and behavioral consequences of policy
decisions;
- implementing
programs;
- monitoring
programs and evaluating program effects; and
- performance
contracting for services.
The academy
maintains a small staff of professionals skilled in
program management and development. Directing the academy
is Douglas J. Besharov, a member of the faculty who
teaches courses on family policy, welfare reform, and the
implementation of social policy. Assisting with
curriculum development and instruction is Mathematica
Policy Research, Inc., one of the most respected public
policy research organizations in the nation.
Founded over 25
years ago, Mathematica has expertise on a wide range of
social welfare programs. Recent projects include
extensive evaluations of the Food Stamp program, analyses
of whether health maintenance organizations reduce health
care costs, and the development of microsimulation
software for modeling the effects of changes in welfare
programs.
A West Coast site
will be established by the School of Social Welfare at
the University of California at Berkeley, whose faculty
is distinguished in areas crucial to the academy,
including program evaluation, contracting for services,
and connecting program support from various funding
streams. Members of the Berkeley faculty will conduct
some of the training at Maryland, and Maryland faculty
will do the same at Berkeley.
Start_up funding for
the academy was provided by the Lynde and Harry Bradley
and Annie E. Casey Foundations.
The
New World of Welfare Reform
States now receive
federal welfare funding mainly through an open_ended, but
narrowly constrained, categorical program. The new law
combines a number of federal income support (TANF), child
care, and job training programs into two interrelated
block grants. Under the new system, states get more
flexibility in return for fixed amounts of federal
funding each year.
State and local
officials now have much greater freedom to design and
implement welfare, job training, child care, and other
social welfare programs. For example, the new TANF law
seems to allow states to harmonize their welfare and food
stamp programs. Such integration could result in the more
efficient delivery of services, and might even create
more effective services.
A
Teaching Academy
Although some states
and localities have already begun reshaping their welfare
programs, their success will depend on the analytical and
decisionmaking skills of agency managers and planners.
The Welfare Reform Academy was created to help state and
local agencies meet this challenge.
The primary goal of
the academy is to create a cadre of managers and planners
who can respond fully and creatively to the
challengesand opportunitiespresented by the
new welfare system of block grants. Through hands_on
training in program design, implementation, and
evaluation, the academy will equip participants with the
skills necessary to reshape social welfare programs
according to state and local needs and priorities.
For example, many
states and localities may wish to use their welfare block
grants to convert traditional welfare programs into
workfare or supported work programs. Under workfare,
welfare recipients must accept either private or
community service jobs in exchange for cash benefits.
Under supported work, welfare mothers take private sector
jobs and receive benefits in the form of a wage
supplement. If designed and implemented properly, these
programs might reduce welfare rolls and help recipients
become self_sufficient.
Curriculum
Eventually, we
expect the academy to train executive and agency
officials, legislators, legislative staffers, private
social service providers, and other interested parties
from across the country.
Training sessions
will take place at the University of Maryland School of
Public Affairs and the University of California at
Berkeley School of Social Welfare. Participants will
attend two weeks of intensive training, with a brief
break between each one_week session.
Everyone who
satisfactorily completes the program will receive a
certificate of completion from the University of Maryland
or the University of California. The academy will offer
graduate_level education in five areas:
Understanding
the New Welfare Reform Environment: What are the specific
provisions of the new welfare law, and the choices that
states and localities face? This introduction will
familiarize participants with the new law and explain
critical policy and budget implications. Instructors will
explain the policy options that exist under the new
system, including ways in which funding streams can be
redirected. Participants will explore the possibilities
of integrating programs while targeting resources more
effectively on specific populations. For example, a state
may decide to focus TANF resources on child care services
for its low_income population. In addition to covering
the range of flexibility states and localities will have,
instructors will address the implications of new
restrictions included in the legislation.
Estimating Costs
and Behavioral Consequences: How to anticipate the likely
costs of policy decisions and their impacts on target
populations. Some states may be interested, for
example, in reducing work disincentives by increasing
earnings disregards in income support programs. Or they
may seek to create work opportunities for recipients who
do not find jobs on their own. The proponents of such
policies may be firmly convinced of their merits, but may
not fully recognize their cost implications. The academy
will teach participants how to estimate the costs of
specific proposals, as well as their probable
consequences for the populations served, and how to use a
cost_benefit approach to program planning. Participants
will use micro-simulation software developed by
Mathematica to predict how changes in program parameters
may affect caseloads. They will also be taught how to
develop methods for examining secondary effects, such as
how changes in one program can change the cost of others.
Thus, the academy will help states minimize the risk of
unanticipated costs and other outcomes.
Implementing
Programs: How agencies and service providers should
implement the new law. The success of a new program
depends on how well it is implemented. Instructors will
highlight typical implementation problems and identify
useful strategies for overcoming them. Using case
examples, the training will focus on effective ways to
define program goals, reorganize and motivate staff,
redirect resources, delegate responsibility, and assign
tasks. Instructors will also discuss how implementation
is linked to program monitoring and evaluation.
Monitoring
Programs and Evaluating Program Effects: How to monitor
programs and assess the actual effects of policy
decisions on the well_being and behavior of children and
families. Once adopted, new programs must be
monitored closely. Instructors will outline the best ways
program managers can monitor service delivery, including
through specific and quantifiable performance indicators.
Participants also will practice using analytical tools
for evaluating program effects. New program eligibility
rules, administrative arrangements, and program services
can change recipient behaviorfor better or worse.
Determining the impacts of policy changes requires
careful evaluation design. The training will cover: (1)
how sample design and sampling procedures affect the
research questions that can be answered; (2) the types of
data that should be collected; (3) how evaluation can be
integrated with program and policy implementation; and
(4) how resource constraints affect evaluation strategy.
Contracting for
Services: How to Make Effective Use of Outside Resources.
To plan policy and program changes, transform agency
structure and staff practices, or evaluate the effects of
reforms, state and local agencies may find it useful to
contract with outside vendors for certain services.
Contractors may be used to provide basic services, such
as job training and child support enforcement; or to
supplement internal staff resources; or, in the case of
evaluation, to ensure objectivity. Successful contracts
require systematic procurement, a clear definition of
contractor and agency roles and responsibilities, a
sensible degree of contract monitoring, and ongoing
communications between agency and contractor. The academy
will teach participants how to select appropriate
activities for contracting out and how to evaluate and
compare contract proposals. Instructors will also show
participants how to attract the kinds of proposals they
want, get the most for their money, and avoid common
pitfalls of the contracting process. For example, some
states and localities may wish to transform traditional
services into voucher systems. The training will cover
ways to help ensure that such systems work well.
Training will
involve assigned reading and homework, class discussions,
and individual and team exercises. It will also
incorporate various case examples of successful state and
local initiatives. During the first stages of the
academy's instruction, we will concentrate on the
following topics:
1. The History
of Welfare and Welfare Reform
2. Current Programs (including AFDC, JOBS, Food
Stamp, Medicaid, and Housing)
3. Welfare Caseload Dynamics
4. Eligibility, Income Limits, and Other Requirements
5. Benefit Levels and Interaction Among Programs
6. Earnings Disregards
7. Time Limits
8. Job Training Programs
9. Work Programs
10. Child Care
11. Health Care Coverage
12. Child Support Enforcement
13. Family Caps
14. Learnfare
15. Health-Related Rules
16. Noncitizen Coverage
17. Comprehensive Policy Packages
� 1997 by the University of Maryland,
College Park, Maryland. All rights reserved. No part
of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner
whatsoever without permission in writing from the University of
Maryland except in cases of brief quotations embodied in news
articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views
expressed in the publications of the University of Maryland are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of
the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trusties of the
University of Maryland
Back to top